Zakir Naik
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Zakir Abdul Karim Naik (
Urdu:
ذاکر عبدالکریم نائیک; born 18 October 1965) is an Indian public speaker on the subject of Islam and
comparative religion. He is the founder and president of the
Islamic Research Foundation (IRF),
[2] a non-profit organisation that owns the
Peace TV channel based in
Dubai,
UAE. He is sometimes referred to as a
televangelist.
[3][4] Before becoming a public speaker, he trained as a doctor.
[4] He has written two booklets on Islam and comparative religion. He is regarded as an exponent of the
Salafi ideology.
[5]
Biography
Zakir Abdul Karim Naik was born on 18 October 1965 in Mumbai, India.
He attended St. Peter's High School in Mumbai. Later he enrolled at
Kishinchand Chellaram College, before studying medicine at
Topiwala National Medical College and Nair Hospital and later the
University of Mumbai, where he obtained a
Bachelor of Medicine and Surgery (MBBS).
[2] His wife, Farhat Naik, works for the women's section of the IRF.
[6]
In 1991 he started working in the field of
Dawah, and founded the IRF.
[7] Naik says he was inspired by
Ahmed Deedat, an Islamic preacher, having met him in 1987.
[8] (Naik is sometimes referred to as "Deedat plus", a label given to him by Deedat himself.)
[8][9]
Naik says that his goal is to "concentrate on the educated Muslim youth
who have become apologetic about their own religion and have started to
feel the religion is outdated."
[10]
He considers it a duty of every Muslim to remove perceived
misconceptions about Islam and to counter what he views as the Western
media's anti-Islamic bias in the aftermath of the
September 11, 2001 attacks in the United States.
[11] Some of his articles are published in magazines such as
Islamic Voice.
[12]
Anthropologist
Thomas Blom Hansen has written that Naik's style of memorising the
Quran and
Hadith
literature in various languages, and his related missionary activity,
has made him extremely popular in Muslim and non-Muslim circles.
[10]
Many of his debates are recorded and widely distributed in video and
DVD media and online. His talks are usually recorded in English and
broadcast on weekends on several cable networks in Mumbai's Muslim
neighbourhoods, and on the Peace TV channel, which he co-produces.
[13][14] Topics he speaks on include: "
Islam and Modern Science", "
Islam and Christianity", and "
Islam and secularism".
Naik is the founder of the
Islamic International School in Mumbai.
[15]
Lectures and debates
Naik has held many debates and lectures around the world. One of
Naik's most-cited debates was with William Campbell in Chicago in April
2000 on the topic of "The Qur'an and the Bible: In the Light of
Science".
[16]
Naik has said that "despite the strident anti-Islam campaign, 34,000
Americans have embraced Islam from September 2001 to July 2002." He says
Islam is a religion of reason and logic, and that the Quran contains
1000 verses relating to science, which he says explains the number of
Western converts.
[17]
He argues that scientific theories were prophesised by the Quran. For
example, he says certain verses of the Quran accurately describe
embryological development.
[18]
On 21 January 2006 Naik held an inter-religious dialogue with
Sri Sri Ravi Shankar in Bangalore about the concept of God in Islam and
Hinduism.
[19]
In February 2011 Naik addressed the
Oxford Union via video link from India.
[20]
Peace conference
Every year since November 2007 Naik has led a 10-day Peace Conference at Somaiya Ground,
Sion, Mumbai. Lectures on Islam have been presented by Naik and twenty other
Islamic scholars.
[21]
Naik's views
Biological evolution
Naik has said that the theory of
evolution is "only a hypothesis, and an unproven conjecture at best".
[22] According to Naik, most scientists "support the theory, because it went against the Bible – not because it was true."
[23]
Apostasy
Naik has said that any Muslim is free to
convert from Islam
if the person so chooses, but added that if a Muslim converts and then
speaks against Islam or propagates another religion, it should be
considered treason (as in treason to a country). Naik stated that under
Islamic law this is punishable by death
[24]
Terrorism
Naik's views and statements on terrorism have at times been criticised in the media. In a
YouTube video, speaking of
Osama bin Laden,
Naik said that he would not criticise bin Laden because he had not met
him and did not know him personally. He added that, "If bin Laden is
fighting enemies of Islam, I am for him," and that "If he is terrorizing
the terrorist, if he is terrorizing America – the terrorist, biggest
terrorist – I am with him. Every Muslim should be a terrorist. The thing
is that if he is terrorizing the terrorist, he is following Islam.
Whether he is or not, I don’t know, but you as Muslims know that,
without checking up, laying allegations is also wrong."
[25][26] When
Time hinted that this remark could have inspired
Najibullah Zazi's
terrorist activities, Naik insisted: "I have always condemned
terrorism, because according to the glorious Koran, if you kill one
innocent person, then you have killed the whole of humanity".
[25]
In 2010, Naik said that he had been quoted out of context regarding
the remarks on terrorism. "As far as terrorist is concerned," he said,
"I tell the Muslims that every Muslim should be a terrorist. ... What is
the meaning of the word terrorist? Terrorist by definition means a
person who terrorises. So in this context every Muslim should be a
terrorist to each and every anti-social element. I’m aware that
terrorist is more commonly used for a person who terrorises innocent
human beings. So in this context no Muslim should ever terrorise a
single innocent human being."
[27]
In a lecture delivered on 31 July 2008 on Peace TV, Naik commented on the
attacks of 11 September: "it is a blatant, open secret that this attack on the Twin Towers was done by
George Bush himself".
[28]
Propagation of other faiths in Islamic states
Dr Naik says that propagation of other religions within an Islamic
state is forbidden while he appreciates people of other religions
allowing Muslims to freely propagate Islam in their country. Naik
explains this by saying that, for example, mathematics teachers must
teach that 2+2=4 and not 2+2=3 or 5. Likewise, Naik argues, “regarding
building of churches or temples, how can we allow this when their
religion is wrong and when their worshipping is wrong?”
[29]
Other countries
Visit to Australia and Wales
In 2004 Naik, at the invitation of the
Islamic Information and Services Network of Australasia, made an appearance at
Melbourne University, where he argued that only Islam gave women true equality.
[30] He said the more "revealing Western dress" makes women more susceptible to rape.
[31] Sushi Das of
The Age
commented that "Naik extolled the moral and spiritual superiority of
Islam and lampooned other faiths and the West in general", further
criticising that Naik's words "fostered a spirit of separateness and
reinforced prejudice".
[32]
In August 2006 Naik's visit and conference in
Cardiff caused controversy when Welsh
MP David Davies
called for his appearance to be cancelled. He said Naik was a
"hate-monger", and that his views did not deserve a public platform;
Muslims from Cardiff, however, defended Naik's right to speak in the
city.
Saleem Kidwai,
Secretary General of the Muslim Council of Wales, disagreed with
Davies, stating that "people who know about him [Naik] know that he is
one of the most uncontroversial persons you could find. He talks about
the similarities between religions, and how should we work on the common
ground between them", whilst also inviting Davies to discuss further
with Naik personally in the conference. The conference went ahead, after
the Cardiff council stated it was satisfied that he would not be
preaching extremist views.
[33]
2010 exclusion from the UK and Canada
Naik was denied entry into the United Kingdom and Canada in June 2010.
[34][35] He was banned from entering the UK by
Home Secretary Theresa May
after arranging to give talks in London and Sheffield. May said of the
exclusion order, "Numerous comments made by Dr Naik are evidence to me
of his unacceptable behaviour".
[34]
Naik argued that the Home Secretary was making a political decision and
not a legal one, and his lawyer said the decision was "barbaric and
inhuman". He also claimed that his comments were taken out of context.
[36] Film producer
Mahesh Bhatt supported Naik, saying the ban constituted an attack on
freedom of speech.
[37] It was reported that Naik would attempt to challenge the ruling in the
High Court.
[38] His application for judicial review was dismissed on 5 November 2010.
[7] Naik was forbidden from entering Canada after
Tarek Fatah, founder of the
Muslim Canadian Congress, warned MPs of Naik's views.
[35]
Reception
Naik was ranked 89 on
The Indian Express's list of the "100 Most Powerful Indians in 2010".
[39] He was ranked 82 in the 2009 edition.
[40] According to
Praveen Swami, Naik is "perhaps the most influential
Salafi ideologue in India".
[41] Sanjiv Buttoo says he is acknowledged as an authority on Islam, but is known for making negative remarks about other religions.
[34] Sadanand Dhume
writes that Naik has a "carefully crafted image of moderation", because
of his gentle demeanor, his wearing of a suit and tie, and his quoting
of scriptures of other religions.
[42] He is also mentioned in the book "The 500 most influential muslims – 2011" under honourable mentions.
[citation needed]
Criticism
In
The Wall Street Journal,
Sadanand Dhume criticised Naik for recommending the death penalty for homosexuals and for apostasy from the faith.
[43]
He also criticised him for calling for India to be ruled by Shariah
law. He added that, according to Naik, Jews "control America" and are
the "strongest in enmity to Muslims." He maintained that Naik supports a
ban on the construction of non-Muslim places of worship in Muslim lands
as well as the Taliban's bombing of the
Bamiyan Buddhas.
Dhume argues that people reportedly drawn to Naik's message include
Najibullah Zazi, the Afghan-American arrested for planning suicide
attacks on the New York subway; Rahil Sheikh, accused of involvement in
a series of train bombings in Bombay in 2006; and
Kafeel Ahmed, the Bangalore man fatally injured in a
failed suicide attack on Glasgow airport in 2007.
He concluded that unless Indians find the ability to criticise such a
radical Islamic preacher as robustly as they would a Hindu equivalent,
the idea of Indian secularism would remain deeply flawed.
[43]
The Times of India published a profile of Naik entitled "The controversial preacher" after he was banned from the United Kingdom. According to
The Times,
"the fact is that barring the band of Muslims whose bruised egos Naik
suitably massages through his Islam supremacist talks, most rational
Muslims and non-Muslims find his brand of Islam a travesty of the
faith".
The Times
also claimed that "the Wahabi-Salafist brand of Islam, bankrolled by
petro-rich Saudi Arabia and propagated by preachers like Naik, does not
appreciate the idea of pluralism."
[44]
The article quotes Muslim scholar
Wahiduddin Khan:
"Dawah, which Naik also claims to be engaged in, is to make people
aware of the creation plan of God, not to peddle some provocative,
dubious ideas as Naik does". He adds: "The wave of Islamophobia in the
aftermath of 9/11 and the occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan have only
added to the Muslims’ sense of injury. In such a situation, when a
debater like Zakir Naik, in eloquent English, takes on preachers of
other faiths and defeats them during debates, the Muslims’ chests puff
with pride. A community nursing a huge sense of betrayal and injustice
naturally lionises anyone who gives it a sense of pride. Never mind if
it’s false pride".
[44]
Indian journalist
Khushwant Singh
says he "disagree[s] with almost everything [Naik] has to say about
misconceptions about Islam". Singh argues that Naik's pronouncements are
"juvenile", and said "they seldom rise above the level of undergraduate
college debates, where contestants vie with each other to score brownie
points".
[45]
Singh also says Naik's audiences "listen to him with rapt attention and
often explode in enthusiastic applause when he rubbishes other
religious texts".
[46]
Yoginder Sikand wrote in 2011 that influential sections of the
Deobandi community in India were beginning to hold a negative view of Naik. They said he was not abiding by
ijma (Islamic consensus) and
qiyas (analogical deduction of the Quran and Hadith), and therefore, in Sikand's view, was undermining their authority.
[47]
Torkel Brekke,
a professor of religious history in Norway, calls Naik a "very
controversial figure" because of his rhetorical attack on other
religions and other varieties of Islam.
[48] He writes that Naik is "strongly disliked" by many members of the Indian
ulema for ignoring their authority and stating that anybody can interpret the Quran.
[48] Conservative
Deobandi mullahs have accused Naik of "destroying Islam" by driving Muslims away from the correct religious authorities.
[48]
While being lauded by some of his Muslim contemporaries for his
dawah work and for the fact he has brought people to Islam, he has been criticised for his opposition to
taqlid; that is, the following of one of the four accepted
madhabs, or schools, of Islam.
[49] Taqlid is one of the established principles of Islam, so fundamental in fact that some have accused those who reject it of "deviancy",
[50] a much weightier claim than the word might otherwise indicate. However, Naik's claims have been repeatedly challenged.
[50][51][52][53][54]
Khaled Ahmed criticised Naik for "indirectly support[ing]"
Al-Qaeda by referring to
Osama bin Laden as a "soldier of Islam".
[55] In 2008 an Islamic scholar in
Lucknow, shahar qazi Mufti Abul Irfan Mian Firangi Mahali, issued a
fatwa against Naik, saying that he supported
Osama bin Laden, and that his teachings were un-Islamic.
[56]
Praveen Swami
considers Naik to be a part of the ideological infrastructure created
to feed "Tempered Jihad", which he defines as Jihad calibrated to
advance Islamist political objectives.
[41]
Swami argued that some of Naik’s teachings are similar to those of
organizations advocating violence, although Naik himself emphatically
rejects terrorism.
[57] According to Swami, Naik's IRF has proved to be a "magnet" for figures linked to the
Lashkar-e-Taiba,
while his message has mesmerised violent Islamists, and his works "help
make sense of the motivations of Indian recruits to the
jihad."
[41]
External links
References
- ^ Warikoo, Kulbhushan (2011). Religion and security in South and Central Asia. Taylor & Francis. p. 61. ISBN 978-0-203-84023-8.
- ^ a b "Dr. Zakir Naik". Islamic Research Foundation. Retrieved 16 April 2011.
- ^ Hope, Christopher. "Home secretary Theresa May bans radical preacher Zakir Naik from entering UK". The Daily Telegraph. 18 June 2010. Retrieved 7 August 2011. Archived 7 August 2011.
- ^ a b Shukla, Ashutosh. "Muslim group welcomes ban on preacher". Daily News and Analysis. 22 June 2010. Retrieved 16 April 2011. Archived 7 August 2011.
- ^ Warikoo, Kulbhushan; Religion and security in South and Central Asia, Taylor & Francis, 2010
- ^ Ramanujan, Sweta. "Beyond veil: Am I not a normal Muslim girl?". expressindia.com. Indian Express Group. 16 July 2004. Retrieved 16 April 2011. Archived 16 April 2011.
- ^ a b "Dr Zakir Naik vs (1) The Secretary of State for the Home Department (2) Entry Clearance Officer, Mumbai, India". British and Irish Legal Information Institute. 5 November 2010. Retrieved 21 July 2011.
- ^ a b Wahab, Siraj. "Spreading God’s Word Is His Mission". Arab News. 1 July 2006. Retrieved 16 April 2011. Archived 7 August 2011.
- ^ Lloyd Ridgeon (7 March 2001). Islamic Interpretations of Christianity. Palgrave Macmillan. p. 213. ISBN 978-0-312-23854-4.
- ^ a b Thomas Blom Hansen (2001). Wages of Violence: Naming and Identity in Postcolonial Bombay. Princeton University Press. p. 176. ISBN 978-0-691-08840-2.
- ^ Hassan, Javid; Rasooldeen, Mohammed. "Media Urged to Counter Anti-Muslim Bias". Arab News. 9 October 2005. Retrieved 7 August 2011. Archived 7 August 2011.
- ^ See, for example: "Questions Commonly Asked by Non-Muslims – VI : Prohibition of Alcohol", "Was Islam Spread by the Sword?", "Are Ram And Krishna Prophets Of God?".
- ^ Mazumdar, Sudip. "Beaming In Salvation". MSNBC. 23 January 2006. Archived 18 January 2006.
- ^ Ahmad, Syed Neaz. "Peace TV Reaching 50 Million Viewers – Dr. Zakir Naik". Saudi Gazette. 23 February 2007. Archived 7 July 2007.
- ^ "Conceived and Developed by Dr. Zakir Naik:". Islamic Research Foundation. Retrieved 16 April 2011. Archived 16 April 2011.
- ^ Ahmed, Khaled. "Word for word: William Campbell versus Zakir Naik". Daily Times (Pakistan). 8 January 2006. Retrieved 16 April 2011.
- ^ Ghafour, P.K. Abdul. "New Muslims on the rise in US after Sept. 11". Arab News. 3 November 2002. Archived 17 September 2003.[dead link]
- ^ Samuel, Geoffrey; Rozario, Santi. "Contesting science for Islam: the media as a source of revisionist knowledge in the lives of young Bangladeshis" (subscription required). Contemporary South Asia 18 (4): 427–441. December 2010. doi:10.1080/09584935.2010.526196.
- ^ "No religion spreads violence: Sri Sri". The Times of India. 22 January 2006. Retrieved 7 August 2011. Archived 7 August 2011.
- ^ "Controversial Islamic preacher speaks at Union". The Oxford Student. 17 February 2011. Retrieved 21 July 2011. Archived 21 July 2011.
- ^ Ahmad, Syed Neaz. "Justice, peace & unity: The cornerstone of Islam". Saudi Gazette. 31 March 2008. Retrieved 7 August 2011. Archived 7 August 2011.
- ^ Attaullah, Munir. "View: The Muslim predicament II". Daily Times (Pakistan). 21 March 2007. Retrieved 21 July 2011.
- ^ Quran and Modern Science – Conflict or Conciliation? – Part Two – by Dr. Zakir Naik
- ^ "Maldivian renounces Islam, gets attacked by Zakir Naik audience". Haveeru Daily. 30 May 2010. Retrieved 7 August 2011. Archived 7 August 2011.
- ^ a b Von Drehle, David; Ghosh, Bobby: "An Enemy Within: The Making of Najibullah Zazi". Time. p. 2. 1 October 2009. Retrieved 16 April 2011.
- ^ "Zakir Naik, Every Muslim Should be a Terrorist, YouTube". Retrieved 27 October 2011.
- ^ Deshmane, Akshay. "Zakir Naik will fight back as Canada bans him too". Daily News & Analysis. 23 June 2010. Retrieved 7 August 2011. Archived 7 August 2011.
- ^ "Indian Muslim Cleric Zakir Naik: 9/11 Was Carried Out by George Bush Himself" (video of lecture). Middle East Media Research Institute. (subscription required). referring to various 9/11 Conspiracy Theories Transcript. Archived 7 August 2011.
- ^ "Who’s responsible for the stereotypes of Islam?" by Sudheendra Kulkarni; The Indian Express, 1 April 2007
- ^ Das, Sushi. "Islam's gender debate at the fore". The Age. 30 August 2004. Retrieved 7 August 2011. Archived 7 August 2011.
- ^ Aly, Waleed. "The clash of ignorance". The Age. 6 August 2005. Retrieved 7 August 2011. Archived 7 August 2011.
- ^ Das, Sushi. "Between two worlds". The Age. 28 July 2005. Retrieved 7 August 2011. Archived 7 August 2011. See author profile.
- ^ "Row over Islamic preacher". South Wales Echo. 16 August 2006. Retrieved 7 August 2011. Archived 7 August 2011.
- ^ a b c "Indian preacher Zakir Naik is banned from UK". BBC News. 18 June 2010. Retrieved 7 August 2011.
- ^ a b Carlson, Kathryn Blaze. "Controversial Muslim televangelist Zakir Naik banned from Toronto conference". National Post. 22 June 2010. Retrieved 7 August 2011. Archived 7 August 2011.
http://banglamdfarid-com.webs.com/
www.banglamdfarid.com